Drinking
the Kool-Aid: Ignoring China’s Rise to Dominance
By
Amanda Middleberg
September
2007
amiddle@uga.edu
?After
examining great shifts in world power over the past four to five hundred years,
history tells us that world dominance does not last forever. Portugal, Spain,
France, and England
have all been world leaders in the past. These nations have now all been
relegated to average powers, and now the United States is in the lead. The
question on everyone’s mind now is: Is China next? China has a strong economic connection to the United States
and many countries worldwide. America
particularly relies on China
for imports, exports, and other forms of economic assistance. If China can increase its power over America by gaining its own powerful allies, the U.S.
could suffer greatly. The United States
must relay this information to its citizens and its allies, or hegemonic power
for America
could soon be over. China can
no longer be ignored and the U.S.
must begin its quest for help.
Recently, the
Bush administration has decided to take an anti-Chinese sentiment against China. This may
be sparked by China’s
goal of “creating the world’s largest regional power block on the planet whose
sheer size would give them supremacy at any multilateral negotiating table?
(Pelanda 2007). Basically, China
is not looking to align itself with the United States, and is instead
preparing to be the new hegemonic power. In the mean time, China is being careful and cordial with the United States.
However, this will change as China
gains enough power to override America
both politically and economically. China
seeks to pull certain areas in the Pacific, Australia,
Russia, and India into its
regional block. This union of states could significantly limit American power.
At its current growth rate, China
could hypothetically accomplish its goal, and hurt the United States
in terms of important imports, exports, and natural resources, such as oil.
America heavily relies
on China
for several reasons. China
has become the third largest importer of oil, which is one reason why gas
prices have become so high (Newsweek). This fact digs in the pockets of every American
citizen who complains of rising oil prices. The United
States and China
are competing heavily for oil in countries such as Canada,
Angola, Indonesia, Iran,
Saudi Arabia, Kazakhstan, Sudan,
and Venezuela.
China
has recently made deals with all of these countries for oil supplies. This
could cause high energy costs and a dwindling economy for the United States.
If there is a
large shift in oil flow to China
instead of America,
it could cause huge security problems. This is of great concern to government
officials. This asks the question of whether these new agreements have included
Chinese arms and military aid to countries like Nigeria
and Sudan.
As China becomes closer with
so called “problem countries,?like Venezuela,
Sudan, and Iran, the United
States will begin to see China as more of a security threat
(Klare 2005). U.S. military preparation for a
possible Chinese conflict will continue to grow as these ties grow stronger.
While increasing military strength may make the United States feel better about combating
Chinese dominance, it is not the answer. If China’s main goal is to gain
regional dominance by forming alliances with bordering countries, the U.S.
military, already stretched too thin, will have a difficult time competing with
“the largest regional power block on the planet?(Pelanda 2007).
Oil is not the
only way China weighs
heavily on America’s
economic system. David Altman of the New York Times writes that, ?st1:country-region w:st="on">China has an unlimited supply of
cheap labor that threatens American workers. China
stacks the deck against foreign companies that invest there and China
will destroy American manufacturing?(New York Times 2007). While American
government officials recognize the threat China poses, it is not working hard
enough to form unions to make sure that it stays a dominant power. China could
easily use its economic advantage to gain power. The United States does not have the
upper hand in this situation anymore.
To further show China’s intention for dominance, the article
entitled China’s National Defense in 2004, smirks at
the United States.
A line from this article states, "The trends toward world multipolarization and economic globalization are deepening
amid twists and turns. New changes are occurring in the balance of power among
the major international players, with the process of their realignment and the
redistribution of their interests accelerated" (Donnelly 2004). As the United States slips and multilateralism
overhauls American hegemonism, China has and
will take steps to becoming the next world leader. China
already sees the United
States as an achievable obstacle to overcome
to reach hegemonic power. This is primarily because China now has vast economic
influence.
?China has also
become the world's largest producer of coal, steel and cement. The country’s
exports to the United States
have grown by 1,600 percent over the past 15 years, and U.S. exports to China have grown by 415 percent
(Newsweek). It claims the title of second largest holder of foreign-exchange
reserves and the world's largest army of 2.5 million men. China also has the fourth largest
defense budget. The United States
still has a clear military advantage over China due to its funding for
military technology. However, China’s
defense budget is rising by ten percent yearly, and new technology could be
developed sometime in the future. China
is less of a threat to the United
States militarily as it is economically. It
will become what is known as an “asymmetrical superpower.?This means it will
use its economic and political influence to gain power around the world. Hypothetically,
the country will use its advantages to manipulate countries into making
arrangements which are in China’s
interests. If China
learns to deal appropriately with countries in a friendly manner, it could gain
many allies by this process.
Growth in China has provided large benefits for all
countries, but especially for the United States. Over the last
decade, inexpensive imports from China have saved American consumers
over $600 billion dollars. According to The
Economist, it was China that helped save the world from recession
after ?st1:country-region w:st="on">America’s
stock market bubble burst in 2000-2001.?The country has also allowed Americans to keep borrowing and spending
to keep the world economy going by buying U.S. Treasury bills (Newsweek). The United States needs China’s help, and would experience
many difficulties if their connection was broken. But how easy and for how long
can these countries maintain a cordial relationship when there is so much at
stake?
Right now China needs the United States in order to continue
its growth. It is not ready to be on its own two feet just yet. However, China is looking for new allies in Japan, Australia,
South Korea,
and the Pacific. Eventually it also wants to draw in India,
Russia and Taiwan. While
this is not an immediate threat, as China
has not done much to show these countries it is a friendly neighbor, it could
happen when these countries start realizing the benefit China could provide. It is evident
now that America
is already losing some of its power and leverage in world affairs. The United States has already deemed China as an international threat, and turbulence
could shake ties between alliances who may decide to join China. There is
already tension between the two competing powers, which could eventually turn
into conflict.
China began its economic reforms in 1979 after Deng Xiaoping pushed for
development, modernization, and the use of facts rather than ideology “to guide
its path?(Newsweek). Since then, the country has grown about nine percent
annually, which is the fastest growing rate in history (Newsweek). It has
helped 300 million people get out of poverty and has raised the average income
by four times. While the Chinese government is certainly not perfect, it has
reached incredible goals in a very short amount of time. We can assume this
could only continue.
President Bush
and China’s President Hu Jintao traveled through Asia together in November 2004. Interestingly, almost
every person who spoke with Newsweek journalist, Fareed
Zakaria, after the tour said that President Bush did
not impress them the way Presisdent Jintao had. They said President Bush spoke too much about
terrorism and did not address issues of the economy, health care, social
problems, and environmental concerns. On the other hand, President Hu addressed all of these issues. President Bush cannot be
so one dimensional. People of the world are looking for ways to keep their
every day lives in order. It is regrettable that Bush placed a bad impression
of the United States on the
citizens of Asia. This could ultimately affect
the efforts by the U.S.
But what should the United
States government do about China? The United States has already declared China a threat,
but it should retract this statement, at least for the time being. Finding more
diplomatic ways to negotiate could quell Chinese dominance. First, the United States must educate its own citizens
about possible dangers China
may pose to our economy. U.S.
operatives and important government officials should know the language and
understand the culture as to better deal with Chinese. As this seems very
general, accepting another’s culture is one of the key components to diplomacy.
Hopefully by understanding the Chinese, the United States and other countries
can avoid a conflict. On the other hand, there is reason to believe that this
might not work. It is very probably that the Chinese will not be eager to give
up its goal of becoming the new world hegemon.
For this reason,
America
must begin looking for allies. If one day the United
States must stand up to China, it must have the support of
its own citizens and of strong alliances. Clearly going into conflict without
support did not work for the War in Iraq, and should not be tried
again. To do this, America
must find ways to get countries on its side. Evidently, the tour President Bush
took with President Hu through Asia
was unsuccessful because he did not appeal to Asian’s every day problems.
Investing in infrastructure, health care, environmental protection, and the
economy for its allies could prevent a potential financial crisis later. It is
obvious that deals will need to be made to get an alliance formed.
While I am
usually a person that believes in non-combative ways to solve conflict, this
class has taught me that this is not always the answer. I believe the United States
should first begin by learning the culture and discussing matters with Chinese
government officials. However, the United States must be prepared for
what seems like the inevitable. In order to avoid this conflict, I believe a
Grand Alliance is a good idea. America needs to begin discussions quickly,
because China
could influence potential American alliances first. Powerful countries like India, Japan,
and those of the European Union will be crucial in making China
discontinue its efforts. The United States
must be aware of what China
can do and realize the urgency of coming up with ideas NOW. It is not something
that should be dealt with later, for then it might be too late. I believe this
class has made me more of a realist when it comes to forming alliances and the
possibility of war. If there is not realism present when making decisions, the United States
could take on the same fate as past world powers. It is said that “History
teaches everything, including the future,?but not if the U.S. takes the
right steps.